It is good to be finally posting since I am the only one
left. I should explain myself, I thought
the blog was called the “silent primary” so I thought I would stick with that
theme and remain so (as difficult as that is for me). Now that I know it is the invisible primary I
plan talk much but remain invisible (equally hard for me…).
As a person who likes to pay attention to budgeting and
budgeting processes, the current budget-centered battles provide a great
indicator of the temperature of our current hidden primary. The sequestration alone seems to be a proxy
war of sorts for the 2014 congressional primaries and beyond. The insightful Stan Collender, in his blog Capital Gains and Games, talks here
about how the GOP decision to move forward with the sequester cuts had nothing
to do with the budget and everything to do with the potential to be “primaried”
by the right-wing of the party.
Challenges from the right become even more important, and the ability to
move safely to the right in defending your seat is even more essential given
serious efforts to make districts more and more safe. As the general election becomes more and more
irrelevant, the primaries become the true focus of elections.
Of course, you can’t “redistrict” a whole state so it makes
it trickier for Senators to use this playbook to its full extent. Senator Pat Toomey used this
move-to-the-right approach in his earlier House wins and in 2010 to win his
Senate seat. But given the problems the
Democrats faced with the Arlen Specter switch and a weak campaign strategy
offered by Congressman Joe Sestak, it is not necessarily a strategy that will
serve him well in 2016. This is
particularly true given the fact that Pennsylvania Democrats have a 1 million
registered voter advantage over Republicans.
Toomey’s role on the not-so-super committee makes one think he is going
to stick to his well-tested run-right strategy,
But he tries to make sure everyone thinks he is one of the “reasonable”
Republican’s by not joining the Tea Party Caucus and by making appearances on the
liberal-acceptable-republican show, Morning Joe, here (any
Republican drinking Starbucks with a woman must be okay, right?). But it is hard to reconcile this given his
recent Club For Growth’s “Defender of Economic Freedom” award.
Why are you always bashing Joe Sestak?????????
ReplyDelete