The
baddest of the running bad-asses in Chambersburg is my friend Johna, both
whip-smart and jamming-fast, but I can only talk to her when she’s stationary - otherwise she is a sprinting blond dot way ahead of
me. Recently I had her cornered and our conversation turned to politics. Johna
posed the question of the Democratic nomination in 2016: Hillary or Biden? It
is a great question, and the fact that Johna asked it made me think about the
differences between running and “running.” Stay with me here: Johna runs a 7
minute mile and runs about 20 miles a day. That is RUNNING. That is running in
a way that most of us cannot fathom. That is running for reals, as the kids
say, and compared to Johna I am a koala (it’s the sleepiest animal in the
world. I looked it up). I run 6, maybe 8 miles at a sluggish pace and while I
am “running” I am not really running. Johna runs for a personal record (PR), I run to listen
to music and avoid people. Johna will win medals, I will be able to eat two goldfish
crackers and not gain weight. Johna is running. I am “running.” And even though
both forms of running involve the essentially same movements, they are entirely
different activities.
The
same thing can be said for the race to the White House. There are good reasons
to “run” for president in our fabulous Invisible Primary, beyond the base craving
to look in the mirror and say “Hello Mr. (or Mrs.) President.” I recently did a
fun interview with the Financial Times
where I spoke about this, so please allow me here to briefly address those
reasons to “run” for president, as opposed to actually RUNNING for president.
·
Name
recognition = Book and TV deals. You may think me cynical, but give Mike
Huckabee a shout at Fox and ask him how it all worked out for him? Cha-Ching!
·
Power
positioning: You may not make the show, but you may get a job at State. And if
you are, say, the Governor of Montana, State looks pretty good right about now.
Not that there’s anything wrong with Montana.
·
Ideological
positioning: A tip of the tin foil hat goes to Uncle Larry here, for his
steadfast devotion to Ron Paul. The good doctor just kept it going, long past
the expiration date, just to make a point. And then he handed down the baton to
Rand, to keep that running going in what I will for now on call the “Paul Relay.”
These
reasons add up to a field full of contenders and wannabees, and sometimes it’s
tough to tell who is who. The news stories in the slow August recess weeks are
chock full of 2016 prognostications, and if you glance through the top-10 lists
on both sides, you will see that everyone appears to be VERY serious about running
for president.
My
former boss at C-SPAN, Brian Lamb, always says: “Follow the money” and it’s
good advice. When these cats start hunting for real campaign contributions we
will be better suited to see who is running and who is “running.” It’s good to
remember that both running and “running” are not necessarily mutually
exclusive, and the reasons to do both blend in nicely with one another. But it
is fun at this stage of the game to try and guess who is running for a PR and
who is running to distract themselves from syllabi that are due... in 4 days. Just saying.
You
go, Johna!
